The Seattle 2000 Declaration

The Seattle 2000 Declaration on 
Self-Determination and Individualized Funding.

This Declaration was developed during the First International Conference on Self-Determination and Individualized Funding which was held in Seattle in July 2000 and was presented in draft form to the 1250 attendees at the closing plenary.

This conference has been founded on the certainty that people with disabilities have the same rights as other citizens to freedom, equality, equal protection under the law, and control over their own lives. These rights must be honoured if people who have disabilities are to be fully included as valued citizens in the relationships and opportunities of community life.

Many people require personal supports or other services to ensure their full citizenship and inclusion. These supports and services must be funded and provided at a level and in ways that uphold the rights of the individual.

This conference is no less certain that these rights have often been disregarded. Citizens who have disabilities experience oppression in many aspects of their lives. The causes of oppression include poverty, other people’s attitudes, and the systems of publicly and privately funded support services, comprising:

These systems operate in ways that deny control to those they are intended to serve. Without accountability to those who require their assistance, these systems decide how, where and with whom people shall live and spend their days. While this situation persists, people of many nations will not be able to exercise their rights or fully participate in their communities. For these reasons, this conference calls on policy makers in all countries, at all levels of government, and on agencies which provide support, to ensure that the assistance made available to all citizens is based on the following principles:

Self-determination: Founding Principles

1. Self-determination for people with disabilities must be the founding principle of public policy.

2. Legislation to promote self-determination or individualized funding must be grounded in the principles of human rights and social justice.

3. Self-determination is a birthright which must be upheld by government. It is not a commodity to be delivered by services.

4. All people, including individuals with disabilities, have rights and responsibilities to live as full citizens. The barriers that stand in the way must be eliminated.

5. The development and implementation of policy must take account of the interdependence of the individual; others with disabilities; the community; and government.

6. Policy and practice must acknowledge and honor risk-taking as an essential element of self-determination and an important part of life.

7. Demands that individual self-determination should only be allowed when certain standards are met must be rejected.

8. The many contributions made by people with disabilities, which include innovation, problem-solving, improvements in accessibility, and other contributions to humanity, must be recognized.

Action required to support self-determination

9. People with disabilities speak from personal experience, and so with authority and expertise. Their views should be valued, and not regarded as having less importance than those of professionals.

10. People with disabilities and their families must be present and central at all planning and decision-making tables in policy development.

11. Citizens with disabilities and their supporting networks and organizations must be in charge of developing and promoting public policy which is related to the provision of supports.

12. Policy must be designed and implemented to ensure the inclusion of people who are at the risk of exclusion or disadvantage on the basis of ethnicity, culture, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation or other grounds.

13. Negative, entrenched attitudes, both within and beyond services for citizens with disabilities, must be addressed.

14. An understanding of disability as a consequence of society's organisation and other people's attitudes (the ‘social model’) rather than the inevitable result of the individual's impairment (the ‘medical model’) must be promoted.

15. Other citizens must be encouraged and educated to recognize that people with disabilities are entitled to access, accommodation and supports; and that individualized funding is the best way to target supports that meet people’s needs.

16. Governments must require that public funding is used to create systems which support self-determination. Such systems will be characterised by innovation, a focus on results, and employ people with disabilities and their families.

Individualized funding: Guiding principles

17. Individualized funding arrangements must allow for flexible practice within consistent guiding principles.

18. Individualized funding and planning systems must be flexible and responsive to the culture, values and preferences of each person and their family.

19. People must not be required to give up their right to acquire income and personal assets in order to access public funding for disability supports.

20. There must be universal access to funding and support, within a range of individual need which must be defined through a collaborative process.

21. Individual funding systems must include arrangements to provide assistance, where required, in the management of funding and supports, and not limit eligibility on the basis of judgements of ‘capacity’.

22. The design of individualized funding systems must reflect the reasonable assumption that recipients are trustworthy.

23. Individualized funding must be recognized as a means to honor people’s vision for the future.

24. Individualized funding must be recognized for its value as an investment in people and communities.

Individualized funding: Principles for implementation

25. The funding allocated to each person should be based on their individual need, not on pre-defined and arbitrary limits.

26. Individuals must be free to pay the providers of their choice, including family members.

27. Individuals must have full control over their supports, including the planning of supports, and choosing and directing their support providers.

28. People must have a choice of budgetary and administrative support services to assist them in using and tracking their individualized funding.

29. People must be given the opportunity and support to explore options and make their own choices of sources for forms of assistance such as brokerage, advocacy, and peer support.

30. Service providers and agencies must be encouraged to endorse and apply the principles of self-determination and individualized funding; and, in an expanded organizational role, to deliver supports that minimize dependency and strengthen partnerships with the larger community to address barriers to freedom and opportunity.

31. Individualized funding systems, support services, and technical assistance services must be designed and provided so as to ensure that their forms of communication, physical and environmental characteristics, and overall quality do not undermine their accessibility.

32. Individualized funding arrangements must be straightforward and easily understood by everyone.

33. Action must be taken to encourage the recruitment and employment of people with disabilities in the administration of individualized funding systems.

Individualized funding: Evaluation

34. When the success of Individualized Funding is assessed, the evaluation must take due account of the improvements in quality of life, and in particular the extent to which personal choice, control and sense of belonging are enhanced.

35. When proposed or implemented individualized funding systems are compared with block-funded services, it must be recognized that block-funded services have not been generally successful, either in terms of the efficient use of public funds, or in the quality of life provided to the people who received the services.

The Seattle 2000 Declaration was published in 2000.

Article | 19.01.23

Self-Directed Support, USA, Article

Tim Stainton


Co-Director of the Centre for Inclusion and Citizenship & joint coordinator of Citizen Network Canada

Also see